When it comes to the question “US vs Canadian copyright law: which has stronger copyright protection?” the answer requires an examination of various sections in the U.S. and Canadian copyright acts.
Both countries belong to the leading international copyright treaty, the Berne Copyright Convention. Under Berne, the U.S, and Canada must include certain provisions in their respective copyright statutes relating to issues such as:
- Automatic copyright protection
- Duration of copyright
- Economic rights
- Rights of paternity and integrity of an author (moral rights)
When using, reproducing and sharing copyright-protected content in the U.S. or Canada, you must apply the copyright laws of that country. Below we highlight several provisions in the U.S. and Canadian copyright acts.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Registration
Copyright protection is automatic in the U.S. and Canada once a work is in a fixed form. Berne requires automatic protection in all member countries. Although registration of a work isn’t necessary in the U.S. or Canada in order to obtain copyright protection, there are advantages for creators to register their works in their respective countries in terms of enforcing their rights.
Many copyright owners who commercially exploit their works register their works with their country’s copyright registration system. In fact, many Canadians also register their works with the U.S. Copyright Office because they can submit a copy of the work, which can act as evidence in a copyright infringement suit. In Canada, the registration system consists of an application only. Submission or deposit of the copyright work is not part of the application, nor accepted by the Canadian Copyright Office.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Duration
In the U.S., the general rule of copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author. In Canada, the general rule of duration is 50 years after the death of the author. In both countries these general rules are subject to a number of exceptions, including ones for works made in the course of employment, government works, and works of joint authorship.
Impact of the USMCA on Copyright Duration
On 30 September 2018, Canada, the United States and Mexico completed negotiations on a new trade agreement, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Note that NAFTA will continue in effect until the USMCA is ratified in each of the three countries.. You can read the text of the agreement here.
Under the USMCA, the minimum duration of copyright protection in the U.S., Canada and Mexico will be life-plus-seventy. For the current time, the duration of copyright protection in Canada remains life-plus-fifty.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Protection of Government Works
In Canada, copyright protects federal government works; however, U.S. federal government works do not have copyright protection in the U.S.
Under American copyright law, U.S. government works are in the public domain and may be freely used without permission. This applies to any work created by an employee of the U.S. federal government as part of that person’s official duties.
The U.S. government may, however, own copyright through assignments of copyright in works prepared by consultants and other non-employees, bequests or other transfer. For example, a consultant, freelance writer or artist may transfer or assign a work they created to the U.S. government. When they do so, the government is then the copyright owner.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Moral Rights
Moral Rights in the U.S. Copyright Act
The explicit moral rights protection that exists in the American Copyright Act (through an amendment made to it by the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 [VARA]) applies to only one group of creators: visual artists, or more accurately, those who create “works of visual art.”
The U.S. moral rights provision provides the following:
- The author of a work of visual art has the right to claim authorship of that work (i.e., have their name on the work).
- Prevention of the use of the author’s name on any work of visual art they did not create.
- The author of a work of visual art has the right to prevent the use of their name where the work is distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified in a manner that would be prejudicial to their honor or reputation.
- The author has the right to prevent any intentional or grossly negligent destruction of a work of “recognized stature.”
Also, the author of a work of visual art may not transfer their moral rights. They maintain their moral rights even if they’re no longer the copyright owner of the work. However, the author may waive these moral rights by signing a written document to that effect. These moral rights last until 31 December of the year in which the author dies.
Moral Rights in the Canadian Copyright Act
In Canada, authors of all works have moral rights. This means a painting, computer software or even a corporate memorandum are subject to moral rights. When reproducing or publicly performing any work in Canada — even U.S. works — you need to respect the moral rights of the author.
In Canada, you need to include the author’s name on the work, and can’t make any changes that may be prejudicial to the honor or reputation of the author. You’re also precluded from using that work in association with a product, service, cause or institution in a manner that may harm the reputation of the creator.
Under Canadian law, an author may waive their moral rights but they can’t assign or transfer them to another person except upon death. Moral rights last 50 years after the author’s death.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Exceptions
Both Canada and the U.S. have exceptions or special provisions for libraries and archives for preservation, interlibrary loan and other specific purposes. Both countries have exceptions for educational institutions and other interest groups and for certain specific uses. These provisions and exceptions only apply when you are using a work in that country.
In addition, the U.S. has the fair use principle and Canada has fair dealing. Determining when either provision applies requires a judgment call based on the specific circumstances of the situation. Unlike specific exceptions for specific user groups, fair use and fair dealing potentially apply to all users of content, provided the use meets the criteria of each principle in that particular circumstance.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: Orphan Works
Orphan works are works whose owners are not identifiable or locatable. For example, historical letters or old photographs are often orphan works. Canada has a provision to obtain a license for the use of orphan works, but the U.S. has no similar provision.
What this means is that you may use an orphan work in Canada if you obtain a license. However, if you’re in the U.S. and can’t identify or locate a copyright-protected work’s copyright owner to obtain their permission, there is no mechanism in the U.S. Copyright Act to permit you to use the orphan work.
US vs Canadian Copyright Law: What do You think?
As members of the Berne Convention, both the U.S. and Canada are obligated to provide minimum copyright protection within their own countries. However, as you can see, each country has interpreted Berne in its own manner and each has unique copyright legislation that meets its own international obligations, cultural industries and policies.
So, in the matter of US vs Canadian copyright law, can you say one has stronger copyright protection than the other? Like in many things copyright-related, the answer may be a matter of perspective.
For an in-depth understanding of U.S. or Canadian and global copyright principles, including use of
third-party content, and practical skills and tools you can customize to meet your particular
needs, see the Copyright Leadership Certificate or its sister program, the
Certificate in Canadian Copyright Law.
